Vittorio Storaro and THE ART OF CINEMATOGRAPHY
- Document
- 27 November 2013
- Event
- no single event
- Retrieved
- 16 September 2026
The image
The document at hand is a recorded presentation: Vittorio Storaro's talk at the 2013 Camerimage festival, where he introduced his book The Art of Cinematography and described the images that shaped his approach to color and light, as reported in an ASC feature on the event. He points to a childhood screening of City Lights, projected by his father, and later a viewing of Citizen Kane before shooting The Conformist, both recalled as personal reference points rather than lessons taken from a manual.
What the documents show
Storaro's own words, as quoted in the Camerimage report, credit specific predecessors by name: Ernest Haller's cinematography for Gone with the Wind, Gregg Toland's work on Citizen Kane, and the color symbolism he found in Walt Disney's animated features. He is explicit that watching Citizen Kane before The Conformist was, in his phrase, not to copy but as some kind of reference. A separate 2016 ASC profile adds that his interest in color grew from encounters with untrained glass and ceramic painters, and records him warning that anyone can reproduce a lamp's distance and intensity or copy a color scheme, while the harder, more personal part is what he calls the human aspect behind the choice. A later 2017 essay, published on the ASC's own site after his first digital feature, restates this in his own words: that the medium changes across history while the underlying wish to express something through the visual arts does not. None of these three documents describes a codified, industry-taught system; each is Storaro's own account, given at a different date.
Production context
Editorially, these statements describe a working method rather than a technical specification: Storaro treats a painter's use of color, or a predecessor cinematographer's handling of light and shadow, as material to study before a production, then applies his own judgment on set. That is consistent with an ASC-member tradition of citing influences by name in trade interviews, but it does not amount to a published, testable color-theory standard that other cinematographers are shown adopting.
Reference versus imitation
Storaro's own distinction is the useful one here: studying Citizen Kane before The Conformist is described as reference, while reproducing a lamp's position and calling it the same achievement is, in his account, missing the point. The documents support crediting him with a personal, recorded set of influences and statements, not with a claim that his method is the way cinematography is taught.
- Is a named influence something the cinematographer actually credits in their own words, or an outside label?
- Does the source describe a personal method or a documented industry standard?
- What does the source say separates studying a predecessor's frame from copying it?
Taken together, the three ASC-published pieces document a single artist's evolving, self-described relationship to color and to the cinematographers he names as reference points, retrieved here as currently published.
Sources & reading trail
Storaro's own Camerimage remarks naming Haller, Toland and Disney as influences and distinguishing reference from copying.
Source published: 27 November 2013 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026
Storaro's account of painting influences and his statement that reproducing a setup is not the same as the human aspect behind it.
Source published: 4 November 2016 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026
Storaro's own essay stating his view that the medium changes historically while the expressive aim of the visual arts persists.
Source published: 9 January 2017 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026
Records, documentation and rulings establish the entry; the reference-versus-imitation reading is Screen Visual Lab editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.